We perform controlled diagnostics of w₀CDM support conditioning using Planck 2018 FULL CMB likelihoods combined with DESI DR2 BAO measurements. Three inference branches are compared using identical datasets, likelihoods, and numerical infrastructure: (i) a neutral control run with broad prior support in w₀, (ii) a non-phantom restricted-support run enforcing w₀ > -1, and (iii) a phantom restricted-support diagnostic run enforcing w₀ < -1. The component-wise likelihood decomposition reveals a structured early-late split: the non-phantom branch improves the lowest-redshift BAO component (LRG1, z ≈ 0. 14) by Δχ² ≈ +1. 3 while incurring a modest penalty in high-ℓ CMB (Δχ² ≈ -0. 6), whereas the phantom branch exhibits the opposite pattern. These component-level effects largely cancel in the total goodness-of-fit (|Δχ²ₜotal| < 0. 2), indicating redistribution along the existing (w₀, H₀) degeneracy rather than decisive model preference. Early-universe parameters remain stable across all branches (shifts < 1σ). We interpret the results as a Stage Zero diagnostic establishing numerical admissibility and internal likelihood structure under support conditioning, serving as a baseline for incorporating genuinely late-time probes in future work. All analyses use Cobaya with CLASS in a four-chain MPI configuration. Complete MCMC chains, configuration files, and reproduction notebooks are publicly archived on Zenodo.
Erik Tobias Hummel (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: