The article analyzes the Indian party system through the dynamics of polarization and fragmentation. It argues that the system’s distinctive character stems from its origin in the anti-colonial movement led by the Indian National Congress, which functioned as a broad umbrella organization rather than a class- or ideology-based party. This led initially to a phase of one-party dominance, followed by fragmentation as ideological and leadership differences produced multiple parties. The study shows that efforts at political consolidation—such as the formation of the Janata Party and later coalitions like the National Democratic Alliance—reflect attempts at polarization, often driven more by the goal of displacing dominant parties than by coherent policy agendas. At the same time, factionalism, personality-based leadership, regionalism, and weak intra-party democracy have reinforced fragmentation.The article concludes that while polarization can strengthen competition, its largely negative and opportunistic character, combined with persistent fragmentation, undermines political stability. Institutional reforms such as constructive no-confidence mechanisms and electoral changes are suggested to address these challenges.
Preeti Awasthi (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: