In vivo MRI quantification of carotid plaque composition was statistically equivalent to histology for lipid-rich/necrotic core (23.7% vs 20.3%; P=0.1), loose matrix, and dense fibrous tissue.
Observational (n=31)
Absolute Event Rate: 23.7% vs 20.3%
p-value: p=0.1
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the ability of MRI to quantify all major carotid atherosclerotic plaque components in vivo. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-one subjects scheduled for carotid endarterectomy were imaged with a 1.5T scanner using time-of-flight-, T1-, proton density-, and T2-weighted images. A total of 214 MR imaging locations were matched to corresponding histology sections. For MRI and histology, area measurements of the major plaque components such as lipid-rich/necrotic core (LR/NC), calcification, loose matrix, and dense (fibrous) tissue were recorded as percentages of the total wall area. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were computed to determine intrareader and inter-reader reproducibility. MRI measurements of plaque composition were statistically equivalent to those of histology for the LR/NC (23.7 versus 20.3%; P=0.1), loose matrix (5.1 versus 6.3%; P=0.1), and dense (fibrous) tissue (66.3% versus 64%; P=0.4). Calcification differed significantly when measured as a percentage of wall area (9.4 versus 5%; P<0.001). Intrareader and inter-reader reproducibility was good to excellent for all tissue components, with ICCs ranging from 0.73 to 0.95. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-based tissue quantification is accurate and reproducible. This application can be used in therapeutic clinical trials and in prospective longitudinal studies to examine carotid atherosclerotic plaque progression and regression.
Saam et al. (Fri,) conducted a observational in Carotid atherosclerotic plaque (n=31). In vivo MRI vs. Histology was evaluated on Area measurement of lipid-rich/necrotic core (LR/NC) as a percentage of total wall area (p=0.1). In vivo MRI quantification of carotid plaque composition was statistically equivalent to histology for lipid-rich/necrotic core (23.7% vs 20.3%; P=0.1), loose matrix, and dense fibrous tissue.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: