Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Let M₀ be a normal linear regression model and let M₁, , MK be distinct proper linear submodels of M₀. Let k \0, , K\ be a model selection rule based on observed data from the true model. Given k, let the unknown parameters of the selected model M ₊ be fitted by the maximum likelihood method. A loss function is introduced which depends additively on two parts: (i) a measure of the difference between the fitted model M ₊ and the true model; and (ii) a measure C ₊ of the "complexity" of the selected model. A natural model selection rule k, which minimizes an empirical version of this loss, is shown to be admissible and very nearly Bayes.
Charles J. Stone (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: