Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Multiple-choice questions (MCQs), the predominant evaluation vehicle in North America, are a reliable and valid measure of knowledge but have many detractors. We use MCQs widely in evaluating undergraduate students in a junior Internal Medicine clerkship but find it difficult to maintain a suitable secure bank of questions. We therefore involved our students in generation of new questions. After one year of this practice we compared the accumulated student-generated questions with those from our faculty. The average facility index and the validity of student-generated questions were comparable to those of the faculty-generated questions. The students' questions were less frequently based on a clinical case scenario than were the faculty-generated questions. We conclude that undergraduate students are an excellent source of MCQs for use in evaluation and that students benefit from involvement in the evaluation process.
McLeod et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: