Ivabradine and atenolol reduced myocardial oxygen consumption during exercise compared to saline (6.7 and 4.7 vs. 8.1 ml/min, P < 0.05) in instrumented dogs.
Do atenolol and ivabradine reduce myocardial oxygen consumption during exercise in instrumented dogs?
Heart rate reduction and negative inotropy equally contribute to reducing myocardial oxygen consumption during exercise, with negative inotropy limiting the increase in diastolic time afforded by heart rate reduction.
Absolute Event Rate: 6.7% vs 8.1%
p-value: p=<0.05
The respective contributions of heart rate (HR) reduction and left ventricular (LV) negative inotropy to the effects of antianginal drugs are debated. Accordingly, eight instrumented dogs were investigated during exercise at spontaneous and paced HR (250 beats/min) after administration of either saline, atenolol, or ivabradine (selective pacemaker current channel blocker). During exercise, atenolol and ivabradine (both 1 mg/kg iv) similarly reduced HR (-30% from 222 +/- 5 beats/min), and LV mean ejection wall stress was not altered. LV dP/dt(max) was reduced by atenolol but not ivabradine. Diastolic time (DT) was increased by atenolol versus saline (195 +/- 6 vs. 123 +/- 4 ms, respectively) and to a greater extent by ivabradine (233 +/- 11 ms). Myocardial oxygen consumption (MVo(2)) was lower under ivabradine and atenolol versus saline (6.7 +/- 0.6 and 4.7 +/- 0.4 vs. 8.1 +/- 0.6 ml/min, respectively, P < 0.05). Under pacing, DT and MVo(2) were similar between ivabradine and saline but significantly reduced with atenolol. Thus HR reduction and negative inotropy equally contribute to the reduction in MVo(2) during exercise in the normal heart. The negative inotropy limits the increase in DT afforded by HR reduction.
Colin et al. (Sat,) conducted a other in Normal heart (animal model) (n=8). Atenolol or ivabradine vs. Saline was evaluated on Myocardial oxygen consumption (MVo2) (p=<0.05). Ivabradine and atenolol reduced myocardial oxygen consumption during exercise compared to saline (6.7 and 4.7 vs. 8.1 ml/min, P < 0.05) in instrumented dogs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: