PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025Moscow University Bulletin Series 21 Public administration0 citations

The Political Determinism of the RSFSR’s Economic Policy in the Market Reforms of 1991

View Full Paper
ILIlya Sergeevich Logvenkov

Key Points

  • The analysis shows the political crisis in autumn 1991 influenced economic policy decisions and market reforms.
  • By October 1991, the collapse of political coalitions and regional influences pushed Yeltsin to adopt rapid economic changes.
  • Historical-genetic and abstract-logical methods were employed to analyze the impact of political decisions on economic strategies.
  • The findings highlight the struggles in implementing the initial economic reforms due to regional instability and Western alignment needs.

Abstract

Study examines the interplay between political motivations and the formulation of economic policy in the state decision-making process that initiated radical market reforms in Russia in October 1991. Employing the historical-genetic method, the research evaluates the role of external and internal factors that predetermined the choice of market transformation programs. The abstract-logical method is applied to identify distortions in the original reform blueprint following Yeltsin’s policy address to the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR on October 28, 1991. The study demonstrates that by autumn 1991, the country stood on the brink of a systemic political crisis. This crisis unfolded under two interrelated circumstances: the collapse of the anti-Union coalition in the Russian parliament and the persistent influence of anti-Yeltsin forces at the regional level. In this context, holding regional, territorial, and republican elections risked institutionalizing state fragmentation and paralyzing central authority. The presidency faced the imperative to retain emergency powers for appointing regional administrative heads and secure a temporary moratorium on elections. The response was a shift toward rapid market transformation. Key features of this decision included the announcement of price liberalization, a pro-Western orientation in the presidential program, and Yeltsin’s assumption of the premiership. While these measures enabled the launch of reforms and the suspension of regional elections through a consolidated act of government branches, subsequent developments—such as the collapse of consumer markets and the need to align with Western states and international organizations—rendered the original reform agenda unfeasible within the declared timeframe.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ilya Sergeevich Logvenkov (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1ad6a54b1d3bfb60e5ef9https://doi.org/10.55959/msu2073-2643-21-2025-2-27-46
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Three attempts at market reform of the Soviet economy: A comparative analysis2026
  2. 2Economic Knowledge in Crisis: Economists and the State in the Late Soviet Union by OlessiaKirtchik. Socio‐Historical Studies of the Social and Human Sciences. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2024. xvii + 319. $159.99. ISBN 978‐3‐031‐72141‐02026
  3. 3Economic reforms of A.N. Kosygin and their impact on Soviet foreign policy in the 1970s–1980s: Lessons for contemporary economic and political strategies2026
  4. 4The Political Economy of Revolution: Examining the Transition From Marxist–Leninist Economics to Russian State Capitalism2025
  5. 5The Political Economy of Revolution: Examining the Transition From Marxist–Leninist Economics to Russian State Capitalism2025