PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 12, 2025Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media1 citationsOpen Access

U.S. Immigration Policy and White Supremacy: A Historical and Contemporary Analysis

View Full Paper
AGAi-xing GuanAffiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities

Key Points

  • U.S. immigration policy historically enforces white supremacist ideology by preserving racial majority.
  • From the 1790 Naturalization Act to the 1924 quota system, laws favored white, European populations.
  • Contemporary immigration enforcement still disproportionately targets nonwhite immigrants, indicating persistence of racial bias.
  • Understanding these systemic issues is crucial for historical accountability and necessary policy reform.

Abstract

The United States has long presented itself as a nation of immigrants, yet its immigration policies have often operated to preserve a white racial majority. This paper investigates the extent to which U.S. immigration law, historically and today, functions as a structural tool for enforcing white supremacist ideology. This paper puts forth the question of how the U.S. immigration policy historically has constructed and sustained racial hierarchy, and in what ways do contemporary laws and discourse continue to reflect these white supremacist foundations? Drawing on legal analysis, historical records, demographic data, and contemporary political rhetoric, this paper finds that from the 1790 Naturalization Act through the 1924 national origins quota system, immigration law explicitly favored white, European-origin populations. Even after the formal abolition of racial quotas in 1965, immigration enforcement disproportionately targets nonwhite immigrants, and nativist ideologies such as the Great Replacement theory have re-emerged in mainstream political discourse. This research exposes the persistence of racial bias embedded in American immigration governance. Understanding these patterns is not only essential for historical accountability, but also for informing urgent policy reform. In a world of demographic shifts and geopolitical competition, the U.S. must move beyond its racialized immigration legacy to harness immigration as both a moral imperative and strategic advantage.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ai-xing Guan (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d44f7331b076d99fa56a0dhttps://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2025.br26708
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Administering Belonging: Immigration Policy and the Construction of American Identity From 1890–19522026
  2. 2Still about race: white supremacy, immigration politics and Trumpism2026
  3. 3White Racial Identity and Preferences for (Non) White Immigrants in the United States2024 · 4 citations
  4. 4Not Quite White: Immigration and the Changing Ethnic Composition of Whites in the United States2026
  5. 5From “Shithole Countries” to “Merit-Based Immigration:” Racial Coding in Trump-Era Immigration Policy Rhetoric2026