The deployment of conditionally automated vehicles raises safety concerns, as drivers often engage in non-driving-related tasks (NDRTs), delaying takeover responses. This study investigates driver state monitoring (DSM) using multimodal physiological and ocular signals from the TD2D (Takeover during Distracted L2 Automated Driving) dataset, which includes synchronized electrocardiogram (ECG), photoplethysmography (PPG), electrodermal activity (EDA), and eye-tracking data from 50 participants across ten task conditions. Tasks were reassigned into three workload-based categories informed by NASA-TLX ratings. A unified preprocessing and feature extraction pipeline was applied, and 25 informative features were selected. Random Forest outperformed Support Vector Machine and Multilayer Perceptron models, achieving 0.96 accuracy in within-subject evaluation and 0.69 in cross-subject evaluation with subject-disjoint splits. Sensitivity analysis showed that temporal overlap had a stronger effect than window length, with moderately long windows (5–8 s) and partial overlap providing the most robust generalization. SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) analysis confirmed ocular features as the dominant discriminators, while EDA contributed complementary robustness. Additional validation across age strata confirmed stable performance beyond the training cohort. Overall, the results highlight the effectiveness of physiological and ocular measures for distraction detection in automated driving and the need for strategies to further improve cross-driver robustness.
Zhou et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: