Synthetic lethality (SL) is an extreme form of negative genetic interaction, where simultaneous disruption of two non-essential genes causes cell death. SL can be exploited to develop cancer therapies that target tumour cells with specific mutations, potentially limiting toxicity. Pooled combinatorial CRISPR screens, where two genes are simultaneously perturbed and the resulting impacts on fitness estimated, are now widely used for the identification of SL targets in cancer. Various scoring methods have been developed to infer SL genetic interactions from these screens, but there has been no systematic comparison of these approaches. Here, we performed a comprehensive analysis of five scoring methods for SL detection using five combinatorial CRISPR datasets. We assessed the performance of each algorithm on each screen dataset using two different benchmarks of paralog SL. We find that no single method performs best across all screens but identify two methods that perform well across most datasets. Of these two scores, Gemini-Sensitive has an available R package that can be applied to most screen designs, making it a reasonable first choice.
Ajmal et al. (Mon,) studied this question.