Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abdominal diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) is a powerful, non-invasive technique for characterizing lesions and facilitating early diagnosis. However, respiratory motion during a scan can degrade image quality. Binning image slices into respiratory phases may reduce motion artifacts, but when the standard binning algorithm is applied to DW-MRI, reconstructed volumes are often incomplete because they lack slices along the superior-inferior axis. Missing slices create black stripes within images, and prolonged scan times are required to generate complete volumes. In this study, we propose a new binning algorithm to minimize missing slices. We acquired free-breathing and shallow-breathing abdominal DW-MRI scans on seven volunteers and used our algorithm to correct for motion in free-breathing scans. First, we drew the optimal rigid bin partitions in the respiratory signal using a dynamic programming approach, assigning each slice to one bin. We then designed a probabilistic approach for selecting some slices to belong in two bins. Our proposed binning algorithm resulted in significantly fewer missing slices than standard binning (p<1.0e-16), yielding an average reduction of 82.98+/-6.07%. Our algorithm also improved lesion conspicuity and reduced motion artifacts in DW-MR images and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) maps. ADC maps created from free-breathing images corrected for motion with our algorithm showed lower intra-subject variability compared to uncorrected free-breathing and shallow-breathing maps (p<0.001). Additionally, shallow-breathing ADC maps showed more consistency with corrected free-breathing maps rather than uncorrected free-breathing maps (p<0.01). Our proposed binning algorithm's efficacy in reducing missing slices increases anatomical accuracy and allows for shorter acquisition times compared to standard binning.
Su et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: