Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Steam displacement is prone to cross-flow, small swept area, large oil–water ratio, large oil–water interfacial tension, and low oil displacement efficiency. Compared with steam flooding, foam flooding can effectively reduce the residual oil in the small throat of the main flow channel and the small hole in the near flow channel and increase the overall recovery factor. Therefore, researchers carried out CO2 and chemical agent-assisted steam displacement. However, at present, there is a lack of research on the occurrence mechanism and model of residual oil. Steam flooding often encounters challenges such as cross-flow, limited sweep area, and high oil–water ratio. Foam flooding offers a promising alternative by effectively reducing residual oil in narrow throats and the near flow channel, thereby enhancing overall recovery rates compared to steam flooding alone. Therefore, chemical agent-assisted steam flooding was applied to enhance heavy oil recovery. However, the occurrence mechanism and model of residual oil after chemical agent-assisted steam is not clear. To fill this gap, the CO2 foam viscosity reducer assisted steam (CFVAS) flooding technology has been adopted and carried out in several studies. First, the foam viscosity reducer was prepared and its foam properties (viscosity reduction effect, foam volume, and half-life) were tested. Subsequently, the CFVAS displacement experiments after steam flooding were carried out, and the flow behavior of the remaining oil in multiple regions (main flow channel, near flow channel, and far flow channel) was analyzed. Finally, the shape and number of remaining oil under different displacement stages were compared, and the occurrence mode of remaining oil under CFVAS displacement was determined. The results indicate the following: (1) During steam flooding, the amount of near flow channel residual oil decreased with injected pore volumes (PV), transforming into columnar structures in small perforations and film-like formations in far flow channels. (2) CFVAS flooding, including the foam stability mechanism, flow channel adjustment mechanism, and emulsification and dispersion mechanism, can improve overall recovery rates by 55.2% by driving the remaining oil in near flow channels. (3) During CFVAS flooding stage, crude oil mobility notably improved and flooding front expanded more evenly. Residual oil primarily existed as oil-in-water (O/W) emulsions with discontinuous columns. (4) In the CFVAS flooding stage, residual oil mainly formed O/W emulsions through emulsification and dispersion, with foam-filled large and medium pores, concentrating residual oil in thick and middle throats. This work can provide important references for injecting CO2 gas into reservoirs to enhance heavy oil recovery and promote carbon sequestration.
Shi et al. (Sun,) studied this question.