Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND While large language models (LLMs) often produce impressive outputs, their performance in exams requiring strong reasoning skills and expert domain knowledge, such as the Chinese National Nursing Licensing Examination, remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE We aimed to assess the performance and educational value of justifications provided by large language models, including GPT-3.5, GPT-4.0, GPT-4o, Copilot, ERNIE Bot-3.5, SPARK, and Qwen-2.5, on the Chinese National Nursing Licensing Examination. Additionally, we explored the feasibility of enhancing their performance by combining these models using machine learning techniques. METHODS This retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed multiple-choice questions (MCQs) from the Chinese National Nursing Licensing Examination using GPT-3.5, GPT-4.0, GPT-4o, Copilot, ERNIE Bot-3.5, SPARK, and Qwen-2.5 twice from May 27 to June 27, 2024. The study also investigated machine learning techniques to swiftly enhance the performance metrics of these LLMs. RESULTS Qwen-2.5 achieved the maximum accuracy of 88.92% and the lowest variance of 0.099. Comparisons revealed varying degrees of statistical significance, notably between GPT-4.0 and GPT-4o (t-statistic = 3.27, p-value = 0.001) and GPT-4.0 and Qwen-2.5 (t-statistic = 2.31, p-value = 0.021). Qwen-2.5 exhibited the strongest correlation with correct answers (r=0.86), whereas GPT-3.5 showed the weakest correlation (r=0.40). Integration of the results from seven LLMs using machine learning and ensemble methods identified the Random Forest (RF) model as optimal for enhancing accuracy, achieving an AUC of 0.98, sensitivity of 0.88, specificity of 0.92, F1 score of 0.88, accuracy of 0.88, positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.88, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 1.00. CONCLUSIONS Qwen-2.5 and GPT-4o emerged as the leading performers among the LLMs, with Qwen-2.5 excelling in the Chinese National Nursing Licensing Examination. Moreover, combining various LLMs through machine learning markedly enhanced accuracy, suggesting a promising direction for future applications. CLINICALTRIAL NA
Zhu et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: