PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 10, 202510 citationsOpen Access

Beyond the Benefits: A Systematic Review of the Harms and Consequences of Generative AI in Computing Education

View Full Paper
SBSeth BernsteinARAtaur RahmanNSNadia Sharifi

Key Points

  • The analysis reveals significant patterns in how harms from generative AI emerge in computing education contexts.
  • Review of 224 papers shows identified harms include academic integrity issues and cognitive effects on students.
  • Methodology highlights gaps in rigorous evidence, suggesting a need for deeper exploration of under-researched harms.
  • Findings aim to inform educators and researchers about the potential risks and consequences of generative AI use.

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has already had a big impact on computing education with prior research identifying many benefits. However, recent studies have also identified potential risks and harms. To continue maximizing AI benefits while addressing the harms and unintended consequences, we conducted a systematic literature review of research focusing on the risks, harms, and unintended consequences of GenAI in computing education. Our search of ACM DL, IEEE Xplore, and Scopus (2022-2025) resulted in 1,677 papers, which were then filtered to 224 based on our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Guided by best practices for systematic reviews, four reviewers independently extracted publication year, learner population, research method, contribution type, GenAI technology, and educational task information from each paper. We then coded each paper for concrete harm categories such as academic integrity, cognitive effects, and trust issues. Our analysis shows patterns in how and where harms appear, highlights methodological gaps and opportunities for more rigorous evidence, and identifies under-explored harms and student populations. By synthesizing these insights, we intend to equip educators, computing students, researchers, and developers with a clear picture of the harms associated with GenAI in computing education.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bernstein et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e97a43edb160cc8d84e71fhttps://doi.org/10.1145/3769994.3770036
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Systematic Review Of The Opportunities, Challenges, And Future Prospects Of Generative AI In Transforming Higher Education2026
  2. 2A systematic review of the impact of GenAI on learning performance, AI hallucinations, and problem-solving in computer science education2026 · 9 citations
  3. 3Pedagogical Use of Responsible Generative AI in Higher Education; Opportunities and Challenges: A Systematic Literature Review2026 · 5 citations
  4. 4Generative AI in Higher Education: A Systematic Review with Emphasis on Programming and Computer Science Education2026
  5. 5Generative AI in higher education: navigating benefits and challenges in the technological era2025 · 6 citations