PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 16, 20250 citationsOpen Access

Evolution of the Conflict Between Iran and Israel

View Full Paper
AIAna-Maria ISPAS

Key Points

  • The conflict between Iran and Israel reflects ongoing violations of non-aggression principles and international law, impacting global security.
  • Currently, major powers often paralyze the UN Security Council's ability to maintain peace, contributing to conflicts like that between Iran and Israel.
  • States frequently resort to armed force under the guise of legal exceptions in international law, undermining the legitimacy of peace efforts.
  • The enforcement of the principle of non-aggression remains challenging, suggesting systemic weaknesses in the relevant international frameworks.

Abstract

Although the UN Charter expressly provides for prohibitions limiting the use of armed force by states, war is far from having disappeared from international life. The principle of non-aggression is still violated for reasons that states invoke to pursue their own interests, taking advantage of certain legislative loopholes. However, this cannot be interpreted in such a way as to deny the legally binding force of the principle. The highly centralized system for maintaining international peace and security established by the Charter, the paralysis of the functioning of the Security Council through the exercise of the veto by the major powers, the presumed lack of total adherence by states to the peaceful settlement of disputes, explain why states resort to force to promote their interests and seek, more often than not, to justify their actions by way of the presumed exceptions in international law to the prohibition on the use of force.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ana-Maria ISPAS (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f0ba59c50c73ebef9fa9f9https://doi.org/10.56082/annalsarscimilit.2025.3.56
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1ISRAELI–IRANIAN MISSILE TERRITORIAL VIOLATIONS IN THE AIRSPACE OF SYRIA: A REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL LAW2025
  2. 2Prevention, Proxies, and the Limits of Self-Defence: International Law and the Security Dilemma in the Israel–Iran Rivalry2026
  3. 3The Unlawful Israeli-U.S. Attacks on Iran in 2025: A Doctrinal Legal Analysis under International Law2026
  4. 4Criteria for defining "armed conflict" in international humanitarian law: historical background, current challenges and legal realities2024
  5. 5THE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL SYSTEM PROHIBITING THE USE OF FORCE IN INTERNATIONAL CONFLICTS2024