PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 10, 2026Journal of Sports Sciences0 citations

Smart swim goggles accurately measure heart rate during swim training: A criterion validation study

View Full Paper
AKAidan KitsNENeha Chhatre ElderDEDan Eisenhardt

Key Result

The FORM Smart Swim 2 goggles measured heart rate with a mean absolute percentage error of 1.0% compared to a chest-strap, demonstrating strong agreement in HR measurements.

Key Points

  • To validate the heart rate measurement capability of FORM Smart Swim 2 goggles during swim training.
  • Twenty-five experienced recreational swimmers wore both the goggles and a chest-strap simultaneously.
  • Heart rate data were collected during a prescribed swim workout.
  • Agreement between the goggles and chest-strap was assessed at multiple data aggregation levels.
  • Concordance correlation and mean absolute percentage error were calculated to evaluate measurement accuracy.
  • Mean heart rate from goggles was 136 ± 17 bpm; from the chest-strap was 135 ± 18 bpm.
  • Mean absolute percentage error for heart rate was 1.0 ± 1.2%.
  • High concordance correlation was observed: 0.91 for intervals and 0.99 for whole workouts.
  • Fixed bias for intervals was -0.23 bpm and for whole workouts was -0.24 bpm.

Structured PICO

Do FORM Smart Swim 2 goggles accurately measure heart rate compared to a criterion chest-strap in experienced recreational swimmers?

P
Population
25 experienced recreational swimmers
I
Intervention
FORM Smart Swim 2 goggles (temple-mounted optical sensor)
C
Comparator
Criterion chest-strap (Garmin HRM-Swim)
O
Outcome
Agreement of heart rate measurement (mean HR) between goggles and chest-strapsurrogate

The FORM Smart Swim 2 goggles provide valid heart rate data for monitoring swim training, showing strong agreement with a criterion chest-strap.

Abstract

Accurately measuring training intensity in swimming remains a challenge due to the limited availability of scientifically validated monitoring devices. The measurement of heart rate (HR), for example, would enable the calculation of HR-based training loads. The FORM Smart Swim 2 goggles measure HR via a temple-mounted optical sensor and enable real-time HR feedback. However, the goggles' HR measurement function has yet to be validated. Twenty-five experienced recreational swimmers simultaneously wore the goggles and a criterion chest-strap (Garmin HRM-Swim) during the completion of an assigned workout. Agreement was assessed at four levels of data aggregation: individual data points, intervals, main-sets, and whole-workouts. Respective mean HR (HRmean) from the goggles and criterion chest-strap were 136 ± 17 bpm and 135 ± 18 bpm (mean absolute percentage error = 1.0 ± 1.2%). For HRmean, concordance correlation was high (intervals: 0.91, 95%CI: 0.87 to 0.94; whole-workouts: 0.99, 95%CI: 0.99 to 1.0), and fixed bias was low (intervals: -0.23 bpm, 95%CI: -1.2 to 0.78 bpm; whole-workouts: -0.24 bpm; 95%CI: -0.94 to 0.46 bpm). Strong agreement was observed between the goggles and criterion chest-strap for HR measurements, particularly for HRmean. Since HRmean serves as the primary input for HR-based training load metrics, the goggles provide valid data for monitoring swim training.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kits et al. (2026) studied this question. The FORM Smart Swim 2 goggles measured heart rate with a mean absolute percentage error of 1.0% compared to a chest-strap, demonstrating strong agreement in HR measurements.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696321c991e05aa366cb80c9https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2610787
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper