Key result
FORM Smart Swim 2 goggles match chest-strap HR measurements with ~1% error.
Why the study?
Accurately measuring swimming training intensity remains challenging due to limited validated devices, and the HR measurement function of FORM Smart Swim 2 goggles had not been validated.
Do FORM Smart Swim 2 goggles accurately measure heart rate compared to a criterion chest-strap in experienced recreational swimmers?
Do FORM Smart Swim 2 goggles accurately measure heart rate compared to a criterion chest-strap in experienced recreational swimmers?
The FORM Smart Swim 2 goggles provide valid heart rate data for monitoring swim training, showing strong agreement with a criterion chest-strap.
May support HR monitoring in recreational swimmers; leaves open validation in elite athletes and clinical populations.
Accurately measuring training intensity in swimming remains a challenge due to the limited availability of scientifically validated monitoring devices. The measurement of heart rate (HR), for example, would enable the calculation of HR-based training loads. The FORM Smart Swim 2 goggles measure HR via a temple-mounted optical sensor and enable real-time HR feedback. However, the goggles' HR measurement function has yet to be validated. Twenty-five experienced recreational swimmers simultaneously wore the goggles and a criterion chest-strap (Garmin HRM-Swim) during the completion of an assigned workout. Agreement was assessed at four levels of data aggregation: individual data points, intervals, main-sets, and whole-workouts. Respective mean HR (HRmean) from the goggles and criterion chest-strap were 136 ± 17 bpm and 135 ± 18 bpm (mean absolute percentage error = 1.0 ± 1.2%). For HRmean, concordance correlation was high (intervals: 0.91, 95%CI: 0.87 to 0.94; whole-workouts: 0.99, 95%CI: 0.99 to 1.0), and fixed bias was low (intervals: -0.23 bpm, 95%CI: -1.2 to 0.78 bpm; whole-workouts: -0.24 bpm; 95%CI: -0.94 to 0.46 bpm). Strong agreement was observed between the goggles and criterion chest-strap for HR measurements, particularly for HRmean. Since HRmean serves as the primary input for HR-based training load metrics, the goggles provide valid data for monitoring swim training.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kits et al. (2026) studied this question. The FORM Smart Swim 2 goggles measured heart rate with a mean absolute percentage error of 1.0% compared to a chest-strap, demonstrating strong agreement in HR measurements.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: