PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 17, 2026Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society1 citations

Electrocatalytic oxidation of propylene: Mechanistic insights from dynamic surfaces

View Full Paper
MRMohsin RasoolDLDongho Lee

Key Points

  • The aim is to understand the mechanisms of propylene electrooxidation and how different catalysts facilitate various C–O coupling pathways.
  • Operando x-ray spectroscopy to observe surface changes
  • Vibrational spectroscopy to analyze reactive intermediates
  • Electrochemical mass spectrometry for measuring species
  • Theoretical tools such as Pourbaix analysis and microkinetic modeling for mechanistic insights
  • Propylene electrooxidation involves multiple oxygen species and distinct reaction mechanisms.
  • Different catalysts stabilize specific reactive oxygen species, impacting reaction pathways.
  • The study highlights the challenges in developing selective catalysts for these processes.

Abstract

Abstract Electrochemical oxidation of propylene offers a low‐temperature, electricity‐driven route to produce valuable oxygenates using water as the sole oxygen source. Selectivity, however, remains difficult to control because multiple oxygen species including *OH, *O, *OOH, and lattice oxygen can form simultaneously under applied potential. How these species originate, interconvert, and engage in C–O coupling is central to designing selective catalysts. Recent advances in operando x‐ray and vibrational spectroscopy, electrochemical mass spectrometry, and complementary theoretical tools such as Pourbaix analysis and microkinetic modeling now enable potential‐dependent surface oxidation and oxygenated intermediates to be resolved with much greater clarity. Collectively, these developments reveal that propylene electrooxidation does not follow a single universal mechanism but spans distinct oxygen‐speciation regimes. This review shows mechanistic insights across Pd‐ and Pt‐based catalysts, Ag‐based systems, and transition metal oxides, illustrating how each class stabilizes different reactive oxygen species and thus accesses different C–O coupling pathways. We conclude by highlighting remaining challenges that define the path toward rational, design‐based catalyst development.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rasool et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696b2696d2a12237a9349e5fhttps://doi.org/10.1002/bkcs.70094
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper