PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 18, 2026Journal of Environmental Quality0 citations

Evaluating the fate and variability of soil organic carbon and nitrogen species under conservation practices in the Raccoon River Watershed

View Full Paper
ZZZhonglong ZhangPortland State UniversityMWMay WuArgonne National Laboratory

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the fate and variability of soil organic carbon and nitrogen species under conservation practices.
  • Utilized the Soil and Water Assessment Tool–Carbon (SWAT‐C) for modeling
  • Calibrated the model with monitoring data for streamflow, sediment, and nutrient loads
  • Assessed impacts of no-till, residue harvest with cover crops, and without cover crops
  • SWAT‐C model showed satisfactory performance with efficiency values of 0.76–0.80
  • Several management practices significantly affected carbon and nitrogen loadings
  • Conservation practices potentially improve water quality and carbon sustainability

Abstract

Abstract This study evaluates the fate and variability of soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks and nitrogen species using the latest version of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool–Carbon (SWAT‐C) and assesses how conservation practices influence their dynamics in the Raccoon River Watershed (RRW). Dominated by intensive agricultural production, the RRW is a significant contributor of sediment and nutrient loads to local rivers and the Mississippi River. This SWAT‐C model simulates the export of SOC and nitrogen species and evaluates their responses under varying management scenarios. Model calibration was performed for streamflow, sediment, nitrate, total nitrogen, and organic carbon with monitoring data at both a sub‐basin and the watershed outlet. The SWAT‐C model achieved satisfactory to very good performance, with Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency values of 0.76–0.80, coefficients of determination ( R 2 ) of 0.78–0.86, and percent bias ranging from –18% to 12%. We assessed the effects of three conservation practices on SOC and nitrogen fate and transport: no‐till, residue harvest with cover crop implementation, and residue harvest without cover crops. The SWAT‐C results were compared with a historical baseline to quantify changes in the carbon and nitrogen loadings associated with each practice. This study highlights the role of conservation management and provides valuable insights for improving water quality and carbon sustainability in intensively farmed regions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/696c7835eb60fb80d13966afhttps://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.70133
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Modeling of Non-Point Source Contaminants in a River Basin: Implications for Watershed Management in Semi-Arid Regions2026
  2. 2Evaluation of SWAT‐RIVE's Ability to Represent the Hydrobiogeochemical Dynamics in the Vienne Watershed2025
  3. 3Calibration, validation and uncertainty analysis of a SWAT water quality model2024 · 8 citations
  4. 4Evaluating Best Management Practice Efficacy Based on Seasonal Variability and Spatial Scales2024 · 2 citations
  5. 5Enhancing nitrogen simulations in SWAT for paddy-dominated catchments through improved nitrogen balance module2026