PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 2026Energies0 citationsOpen Access

Small Modular Reactors for a Low-Carbon Future: An In-Depth Analysis of Technology, Impact and Market Potential

View Full Paper
EHEleni HimonaAPAndreas Poullikkas

Key Points

  • This work aims to analyze the potential of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) to minimize carbon emissions and address energy challenges.
  • Conducted a comprehensive analysis of SMRs' technical and economic characteristics
  • Examined competitiveness in electricity, hydrogen, and water desalination production
  • Utilized parametric optimization with algorithms to quantify cost metrics like LCOE, LCOH, and LCOW
  • Assessed performance across varying capacity ranges and capital costs
  • Identified capital cost minimization as crucial for cost-competitiveness
  • Demonstrated competitive LCOE values between 40–100 US$/MWh in electricity markets
  • Found hydrogen production costs ranging from 3.33 to 11.68 US$/kg
  • Noted desalination costs between 0.40 to 0.98 US$/m3
  • Established SMRs as viable for integrated energy–water–hydrogen systems

Abstract

In this work a comprehensive analysis of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) as a pivotal technology for addressing global energy challenges while minimizing carbon emissions is presented. The study examines SMRs’ technical characteristics, economic considerations, and technological maturity, with particular emphasis on their potential as polygeneration systems. SMRs, representing evolutionary advancements of nuclear fission technology, offer near-term deployability, enhanced safety features, and modular economic benefits through factory fabrication and standardized production. The analysis specifically focuses on the competitiveness of SMRs in electricity, hydrogen and large-scale water desalination production. Through parametric optimization using complementary algorithms, the study rigorously quantifies SMR competitiveness by calculating the Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE), Levelized Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH), and Levelized Cost of Water (LCOW) across varying capacity ranges (50–600 MWe) and capital costs (3000–8000 US/kW). The results demonstrate that capital cost minimization is the primary factor for achieving cost-competitiveness, with economies of scale providing secondary benefits. The findings indicate that SMRs can achieve competitive LCOE values within the 40–100 US/MWh range for electricity markets, while hydrogen production costs range from 3. 33 to 11. 68 US/kg and desalination costs from 0. 40 to 0. 98 US/m3, positioning SMRs as economically viable solutions for integrated energy–water–hydrogen systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Himona et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6971bd6a642b1836717e2114https://doi.org/10.3390/en19020522
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper