PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The Breathing Universe: 807 A Minimal Simulation Framework for the Breathing Universe Model

View Full Paper
ICIvo Gerlach Angela Noel Cerfontaine

Key Points

  • The study aims to demonstrate the computational realizability of the Breathing Universe Model within its constraints.
  • Developed a minimal simulation framework based on the Breathing Universe Model.
  • Introduced a conserved scalar substrate without presupposing spacetime or physical time.
  • Implemented continuous redistribution rules to maintain global conservation.
  • Defined coherence as bounded recurrence of configuration signatures under specific evolution rules.
  • Established that the emergence hierarchy of the Breathing Universe Model can be executed in a finite, rule-based system.
  • Demonstrated that all simulation steps are logical rather than physical.
  • Defined observables and integrity tests to ensure the robustness of the emergence sequence.

Abstract

This paper presents a minimal, explicit simulation framework demonstrating that the Breathing Universe Model (BUM) is computationally realizable under its own ontological and structural constraints. The objective is not physical realism, numerical accuracy, or empirical prediction. Instead, the framework establishes that the full emergence hierarchy claimed by the BUM can be executed within a finite, rule-based system without presupposing spacetime, physical time, particles, forces, or geometry. The simulation is constructed around a single conserved scalar substrate defined over an abstract index set with no topology or metric. Pre-structural asymmetry is introduced without localization, followed by continuous redistribution rules that preserve global conservation. Discreteness arises exclusively through formally defined instability thresholds that trigger snapping events. Operator constraints act strictly as non-generative admissibility filters, selecting persistable configurations without creating structure. Coherence is defined as bounded recurrence of configuration signatures under admissible evolution, and a time-like index is introduced only after coherence exists, defined solely as a recurrence counter rather than a fundamental temporal variable. All simulation steps represent logical ordering rather than physical duration, and all simulation elements are structural placeholders rather than physical entities. The framework explicitly defines internal observables, failure modes, and stress tests to ensure constraint integrity and robustness of the emergence sequence. This work functions as a demonstrability artifact. It does not derive operator algebra, map internal observables to empirical data, or claim physical correspondence. Its role is to establish internal consistency and computational realizability, thereby enabling formal operator analysis and falsification protocols developed elsewhere in the Breathing Universe research program.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ivo Gerlach Angela Noel Cerfontaine (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6971be10642b1836717e2b2ahttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18319346
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Breathing Universe: 804_Formal Addendum - Operator Structure, Dynamics, and Falsifiability2026
  2. 2The Breathing Universe_A Minimal Structural Framework2026
  3. 3The Breathing Universe: 108_Canonical Structural Architecture2026
  4. 4The Breathing Universe: 801_Predictive Framework and Unified Closure2026
  5. 5The Breathing Universe: 805_Operator Algebra & Selection Rules2026