CS-GCV ablation effectively manages epicardial VT storm in post-valve surgery patients, being safer than retrograde aortic access.
Does CS-GCV ablation safely and effectively manage epicardial VT storm originating from the LVOT compared to retrograde aortic access in post-valve surgery patients?
CS-GCV ablation using advanced imaging and mapping techniques offers a safe and effective approach for managing epicardial LVOT VT storm, particularly avoiding retrograde aortic access in post-valve surgery patients.
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
Epicardial VT storm can be managed via CS-GCV ablation despite anatomical challenges. Preprocedural imaging/intraoperative navigation ensure success; PTCA wire mapping optimizes targeting, and intracardiac echocardiography ensures safety. It is safer than retrograde aortic access for post-valve surgery patients.
Yang et al. (Thu,) reported a other. CS-GCV ablation effectively manages epicardial VT storm in post-valve surgery patients, being safer than retrograde aortic access.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: