PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Dual Geometric Origins of the Fine‑Structure Constant

View Full Paper
RHR. D. Howard

Key Points

  • The paper aims to explore the geometric basis of the fine-structure constant using a honeycomb unit made of tetrahedra and octahedra.
  • Developed a geometric interpretation based on a tetrahedral-octahedral lattice known as the honeycomb unit.
  • Defined the honeycomb unit using self-similar structures with nodes and volumes.
  • Analyzed two geometrical approximations for the fine-structure constant and their implications.
  • Identified two algebraically equivalent forms for the fine-structure constant: α ≈ √2 / 120φ and α ≈ (√10 - √2) / 240.
  • Demonstrated the role of relational geometry and volumetric symmetries in deriving these forms.
  • Highlighted the honeycomb unit as a useful model for understanding the emergence of dimensionless constants.

Abstract

This paper explores a geometric interpretation of the fine-structure constant based on a recursive, relational tetrahedral–octahedral lattice referred to as the Honeycomb Unit (HU). The HU is defined as a regular tetrahedron decomposed via midpoint truncation into four half-sized tetrahedra and one implicit central regular octahedron, yielding a self-similar 10-node relational structure (4 tetrahedral nodes and 6 octahedral nodes). Repeated inward and outward recursion of this unit generates a scale-invariant tetrahedral–octahedral honeycomb that tessellates three-dimensional space without gaps or overlaps. Within this framework, two closely related geometric approximations to the fine-structure constant are examined: α ≈ √2 / 120φ and the algebraically equivalent form α ≈ (√10 - √2) / 240 Rather than being treated as numerological coincidences, these expressions are interpreted as encoding distinct but complementary aspects of the same underlying geometry: a local tetrahedral excitation scale and a global combinatorial node measure associated with the HU. The paper emphasizes the role of relational geometry, node counting, and exact volumetric symmetries (including the 4:1 tetrahedron–octahedron volume equivalence) in motivating these expressions. The work does not claim a derivation of the fine-structure constant from established quantum electrodynamics, nor does it propose a replacement for the Standard Model. Instead, it presents the Honeycomb Unit as a mathematically rigid geometric primitive that may serve as a useful toy model for investigating how dimensionless physical constants could emerge from discrete, self-similar spacetime structures. The results are intended as a conceptual and structural contribution to ongoing discussions in quantum gravity, discrete spacetime models, and the geometric origins of physical constants. v1

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

R. D. Howard (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698434cff1d9ada3c1fb370ahttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18454679
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper