Papworth评分显著预测糖尿病患者冠状动脉旁路移植术后严重出血（E-CABG 2-3级）（HR 1.807），而其他评分系统则没有。
观察性 (n=297)
No
现有评分系统和临床参数能否准确预测接受孤立CABG的糖尿病患者的术后出血？
Current bleeding risk scores have limited predictive value for postoperative bleeding in diabetic patients undergoing CABG, suggesting a need for a tailored score incorporating gender, BMI, and platelet count.
Hazard Ratio: 1.807 (95% CI 1.057–3.089)
p-value: p=0.030
目前的评分系统在预测术后出血方面未能提供令人满意的结果。女性性别、较低的体重指数和术前血小板计数与术后出血增加相关。需要一种能够更精确预测术后出血的ORS。
Akgül et al. (Mon,) conducted a observational in Diabetes mellitus patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (n=297). Papworth bleeding risk score vs. Lower scores was evaluated on Prediction of severe postoperative bleeding (E-CABG grades 2-3) (HR 1.807, 95% CI 1.057-3.089, p=0.030). The Papworth score significantly predicted severe postoperative bleeding (E-CABG grades 2-3) in diabetic patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (HR 1.807), whereas other scoring systems did not.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: