Current methods for assessing acceleration efforts (accefforts) in ice hockey do not account for the influence of initial skating speed on maximal voluntary acceleration capacity, which may lead to a biased evaluation of acceffort intensity. In this study, we introduce the conceptual approach of the relative acceleration threshold (relthreshold) to ice hockey and outline its potential benefits for the assessment of accefforts. Locomotion data derived from observations of 17 players across 10 official games were used to model the initial-skating-speed-dependent maximal voluntary acceleration capacity (amax–vinit capacity), from which a team-specific relthreshold was determined (relthreshold₇5% = 3. 23 − 0. 365vinit), and, subsequently, applied to assess accefforts alongside a fix threshold set at 2 m·s−2 (fixthreshold₂). Differences in accefforts depended on the method used (relthreshold₇5% vs. fixthreshold₂) as well as the playing position when using the relthreshold₇5%. The fixthreshold₂ reported 89. 1 ± 35. 8% more accefforts than the relthreshold₇5%. However, only one-third of these accefforts exceeded relthreshold₇5%, which is considered indicative of neuromuscularly intense accefforts according to the modeled amax–vinit capacity. Moreover, at skating speeds above 4 m·s−1, the fixthreshold₂ only assessed a negligible number of accefforts, whereas the relthreshold₇5% assessed 27. 2 ± 9. 3% of all its accefforts. In line with established theoretical rationales, the observational findings of this study suggest that an acceleration threshold adapted to the initial skating speed offers a conceptually more valid approach to assessing accefforts in ice hockey.
Bielmann et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: