PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026Minerva Dental and Oral Science0 citations

Comparative evaluation of the bone remodeling of implant with convergent neck walls positioned at the crestal and subcrestal levels

View Full Paper
DVDaniele ViscardiFCFabio CariniABAyt Alla Bader

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate bone remodeling associated with crestal versus subcrestal positioning of convergent neck implants.
  • Comparative study of implant positioning methods
  • Assessment of radiographic differences
  • Statistical analysis of bone loss at each positioning level
  • No statistically significant differences in bone remodeling between groups
  • Average bone loss for crestal positioning was -0.57 mm
  • Average bone loss for subcrestal positioning was -0.683 mm

Abstract

The search for possible radiographic differences between the crestal and subcrestal positioning of the convergent neck implants, concludes by observing the lack of a statistically significant result but with important insights into the positioning method at level B. The average bone loss is favorable for crestal positioning (-0.57 mm) compared to subcrestal (-0.683 mm).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Viscardi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6988270a0fc35cd7a8845f28https://doi.org/10.23736/s2724-6329.25.05147-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper