Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative evaluation reveals bone loss differences in crestal and subcrestal implant positioning, suggesting optimized placement strategies.
The search for possible radiographic differences between the crestal and subcrestal positioning of the convergent neck implants, concludes by observing the lack of a statistically significant result but with important insights into the positioning method at level B. The average bone loss is favorable for crestal positioning (-0.57 mm) compared to subcrestal (-0.683 mm).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Viscardi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: