To address the complex influencing factors, divergent stakeholder demands, and the challenge of quantitative comparison in alignment selection for highway expansion and reconstruction, we systematically reviewed the relevant factors. These factors were classified into four categories—economy, technology, safety, and environment—and comprise 16 subfactors in total. The symmetry of the route selection process is disrupted by the varying priorities of different stakeholders, leading to asymmetric evaluations of the alternatives. Using the G30 Lianhuo Expressway Jingqing section expansion and reconstruction project as a case study, we applied the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) combined with expert judgment to derive weights for each factor. The results indicate that environmental factors carry substantial weight, reflecting increased awareness of environmental protection in contemporary projects. We then developed a comparative model based on the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Applying this model to alignment alternatives between the Jingjiadian and Huachacun sections indicates that Option 4 is the preferred alignment. Overall, the AHP–TOPSIS composite evaluation framework effectively integrates expert knowledge with objective quantitative analysis. It enables the scientific ranking of alternatives and provides decision support for alignment selection in mountainous highways and other linear engineering projects.
Zeng et al. (Thu,) studied this question.