PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026European Heart Journal0 citations

A significant gap remains in LDL-C targets despite the high prescription rate of oral intensive lipid-lowering therapy in post-ACS: there is a need for more widespread usage of PCSK9 inhibitors

View Full Paper
LRL RallidisDTD TsamoulisVBV Bouratzis

Key Points

  • To evaluate trends in lipid-lowering therapy and LDL-C target achievement post-acute coronary syndrome.
  • Prospective observational study using the CALLINICUS-Hellas Registry.
  • Data collected from 18 hospitals in Greece.
  • Assessment of lipid-lowering therapy adherence at discharge and 6 months later.
  • 1790 ACS patients were recruited over 18 months.
  • At discharge, 90% were on high-intensity statins or combinations with ezetimibe.
  • Only 40% of patients achieved the LDL-C target of <55 mg/dL at 6 months.

Abstract

Abstract Background Patients suffering an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are at very high risk for recurrent cardiovascular events. According to 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias in-hopsital high-intensity statin (HIS) at the highest tolerated dose is given and ezetimibe (EZ) is added at 4-6 weeks after discarge if LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) remains ≥55 mg/dL. If the combination of HIS+EZ fails to achieve the LDL-C target, then a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9-inhibitor (PCSK9i) is recommended. Purpose To explore the lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) trends at discharge and 6 months later in patients suffering an ACS. Methods CALLINICUS-Hellas Registry is an ongoing prospective multicenter (18 hospitals of all geographical areas of Greece) observational study evaluating the adherence to LLT and the achievement of LDL-C targets at 6 and 24 months after the index event among ACS patients. Results A total of 1790 consecutive patients with ACS were recruited during the last 18 months. Prior admission 625 patients (34.9%) were on LLT. In particular, 140 (7.8%) were on HIS (monotherapy), 80 (4.5%) on HIS+EZ, 404 (22.6%) on moderate intensity statin (MIS)±EZ or EZ (monotherapy) and 1 (0.06%) on PCSK9i. At discharge HIS (monotherapy) were taking 698 patients (39%) and combination of HIS+EZ 924 (51.6%). On moderate intensity statin (MIS) were 74 (4.1%) patients, on combination of MIS+EZ 37 (2.1%), on monotherapy with EZ 4 (0.22%) and 18 (1%) patients did not receive any LLT. At 6 months after discharge follow-up was completed in 1340 patients. Sixty-five patients (4.9%) were not taking LLT while 75 (5.6%) had not performed lipid tests after discharge despite the instructions for this on the discharge letter. Among those on LLT (n=1275): 451 (35.4%) were on HIS, 657 (51.5%) on HIS+EZ, 70 (5.5%) on MIS, 56 (4.4%) on MIS+EZ, 18 (1.4%) of combination of fibrates+statins, 8 (0.63%) on PCSK9i and 4 (0.31%) on EZ only. The LDL-C target 55 mg/dL at 6 months had been achieved by 514 (40.8%) of the 1260 patients who had their lipids measured and were on LLT. The figure presents the proportion of ACS patients on HIS and HIS+EZ prior admission, at discharge and 6 months later. Conclusions Despite the significant improvement in the prescription of HIS and HIS+EZ in post-ACS patients both at discharge (~90%) and at 6 months later (~87%) only 40% achieve the optimal LDL-C target. This therapeutic gap is mainly due to the very low usage (1%) of PCSK9i and highlights the need for health authorities to simplify their approval process.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rallidis et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698827f00fc35cd7a8847044https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.3739
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper