Key result
High-intensity lipid therapy post-ACS achieves LDL-C <55 mg/dL in only ~41% of patients.
Observational (n=1,790)
Yes
Despite high prescription rates of high-intensity statins and ezetimibe post-ACS, only ~40% of patients achieve the LDL-C target of <55 mg/dL at 6 months, highlighting a significant therapeutic gap and the need for increased PCSK9i use.
Background Patients suffering an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are at very high risk for recurrent cardiovascular events. According to 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias in-hopsital high-intensity statin (HIS) at the highest tolerated dose is given and ezetimibe (EZ) is added at 4-6 weeks after discarge if LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) remains ≥55 mg/dL. If the combination of HIS+EZ fails to achieve the LDL-C target, then a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9-inhibitor (PCSK9i) is recommended. Purpose To explore the lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) trends at discharge and 6 months later in patients suffering an ACS. Methods CALLINICUS-Hellas Registry is an ongoing prospective multicenter (18 hospitals of all geographical areas of Greece) observational study evaluating the adherence to LLT and the achievement of LDL-C targets at 6 and 24 months after the index event among ACS patients. Results A total of 1790 consecutive patients with ACS were recruited during the last 18 months. Prior admission 625 patients (34.9%) were on LLT. In particular, 140 (7.8%) were on HIS (monotherapy), 80 (4.5%) on HIS+EZ, 404 (22.6%) on moderate intensity statin (MIS)±EZ or EZ (monotherapy) and 1 (0.06%) on PCSK9i. At discharge HIS (monotherapy) were taking 698 patients (39%) and combination of HIS+EZ 924 (51.6%). On moderate intensity statin (MIS) were 74 (4.1%) patients, on combination of MIS+EZ 37 (2.1%), on monotherapy with EZ 4 (0.22%) and 18 (1%) patients did not receive any LLT. At 6 months after discharge follow-up was completed in 1340 patients. Sixty-five patients (4.9%) were not taking LLT while 75 (5.6%) had not performed lipid tests after discharge despite the instructions for this on the discharge letter. Among those on LLT (n=1275): 451 (35.4%) were on HIS, 657 (51.5%) on HIS+EZ, 70 (5.5%) on MIS, 56 (4.4%) on MIS+EZ, 18 (1.4%) of combination of fibrates+statins, 8 (0.63%) on PCSK9i and 4 (0.31%) on EZ only. The LDL-C target <55 mg/dL at 6 months had been achieved by 514 (40.8%) of the 1260 patients who had their lipids measured and were on LLT. The figure presents the proportion of ACS patients on HIS and HIS+EZ prior admission, at discharge and 6 months later. Conclusions Despite the significant improvement in the prescription of HIS and HIS+EZ in post-ACS patients both at discharge (~90%) and at 6 months later (~87%) only 40% achieve the optimal LDL-C target. This therapeutic gap is mainly due to the very low usage (<1%) of PCSK9i and highlights the need for health authorities to simplify their approval process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rallidis et al. (2025) conducted an observational in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (n=1,790). Lipid-lowering therapy was evaluated on Achievement of LDL-C target <55 mg/dL at 6 months. Despite high prescription rates of high-intensity statins and ezetimibe post-ACS, only 40.8% of patients achieved the optimal LDL-C target <55 mg/dL at 6 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: