Key result
Real-world lipid-lowering therapy achieves 6-month LDL-C targets in only ~38% of ACS patients.
Why the study?
Despite potent lipid-lowering therapies, a therapeutic gap persists in LDL-C target attainment after ACS, and predictors of treatment failure and impact of intensification need evaluation.
What is the rate of LDL-C target attainment 6 months after ACS, and what are the predictors of treatment failure?
Cohort (n=1,947)
Yes
What is the rate of LDL-C target attainment 6 months after ACS, and what are the predictors of treatment failure?
Guideline-recommended LDL-C targets are poorly attained 6 months after ACS (37.9%) due to clinical inertia, highlighting the need for early initiation of combination lipid-lowering therapy.
Low real-world LDL-C target attainment post-ACS signals treatment gaps; leaves open whether simulated triple therapy improves outcomes in prospective trials.
BACKGROUND: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction is the cornerstone of secondary prevention after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Despite potent lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs), a therapeutic gap persists. We aimed to evaluate LDL-C target attainment according to the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines, identify predictors of treatment failure, and simulate the impact of treatment intensification. METHODS: The CALLINICUS-Hellas registry is a prospective, multicenter study of patients with ACS. LDL-C target attainment at 6 months, defined as LDL-C reduction ≥50% from baseline and an LDL-C <55 mg/dL, was assessed. Simulation modeling explored four guideline-recommended LLT intensification scenarios. Hierarchical cluster analysis aimed to identify patient phenotypes associated with goal attainment. RESULTS: Among 1,947 patients, 37.9% achieved LDL-C target at 6 months. The main driver of treatment failure was clinical inertia, with <1% of patients receiving PCSK9 inhibitors at follow-up. Persistent smoking at 6 months, lipoprotein(a) >70 mg/dL, higher untreated LDL-C levels and heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia were associated with treatment failure while high-intensity statin (HIS) ± ezetimibe (EZE) at discharge was the most prominent predictor of treatment attainment (all p-values <0.05). Cluster analysis confirmed that target attainment depended on discharge LLT intensity, not clinical phenotypes. Simulation analysis showed that universal HIS ± EZE at discharge could increase target attainment to 51%, whereas optimal triple LLT (HIS + EZE + PCSK9 inhibitors) could increase it to 97.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Despite progress, LDL-C target attainment after ACS remains suboptimal, largely due to clinical inertia and guideline-recommended LLT underuse. Early initiation of combination LLT after ACS could substantially improve target attainment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rallidis et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute Coronary Syndrome (n=1,947). Lipid-lowering therapies was evaluated on LDL-C target attainment at 6 months (LDL-C reduction ≥50% from baseline and an LDL-C <55 mg/dL). Real-world lipid-lowering therapy resulted in only 37.9% of ACS patients achieving the 6-month LDL-C target, whereas simulated optimal triple therapy could increase attainment to 97.7%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: