PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026European Journal of Ageing3 citationsOpen Access

Policies for supporting caregivers of older adults with long-term care needs in EU countries: a systematic review

EBEva BeiUniversity of FlorenceMAMarco AlbertiniUniversity of BolognaFTFederico TothUniversity of Bologna

Key Points

  • This review aims to analyze support policies for informal caregivers of older adults in the EU, highlighting their effectiveness and challenges.
  • Reviewed 35 studies and reports from 2011 to 2025
  • Synthesized data on policies across EU countries
  • Examined frameworks of defamilialisation and familialism
  • Policies vary significantly across EU countries, particularly between Eastern and Southern Europe
  • Financial support and in-kind respite care are most common, but vary in generosity
  • Training and counselling policies are less developed, with significant access disparities

Abstract

Abstract In the context of population ageing, increasing long-term care needs and constraints on welfare spending, informal caregivers assume a pivotal role as providers of long-term care. This systematic review synthesises reported data on the diverse support policies implemented across the European Union (EU) to assist them. Findings from 35 studies and reports published between 2011 and 2025 suggest that, despite similar demographic challenges, policies diverge significantly, with some EU countries to have established mechanisms beyond financial assistance to support carers, while others, particularly those located in Eastern and Southern EU, to offer less comprehensive support. While the frameworks of defamilialisation (Nordic), supported familialism (Continental), and familialism by default (Southern and Eastern Europe) provide a useful analytical lens to our findings, the review also identifies significant heterogeneities within welfare regimes and even within countries, often driven by decentralisation and regional disparities. Across all models, financial support via cash-for-care schemes and in-kind respite care are the most common instruments, though their generosity and comprehensiveness vary substantially. In contrast, policies such as training, counselling, and flexible work guarantees are less developed, with their availability and access, however, varying significantly across the EU. Furthermore, the review identifies critical gaps in the geographical coverage of existing literature, with certain Southern and Eastern EU countries being particularly understudied. The synthesised evidence provides key implications for policymaking, thoroughly mapping the implementation of diverse social care policies as reported in the international literature.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bei et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698828330fc35cd7a8847865https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-026-00907-y
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper