PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026European Heart Journal0 citations

Relation of Lp (a) with plaque characteristics and clinical events: ATHEROREMO and IBIS₃ cohorts

View Full Paper
JMJ M Veiga-Fernandes MiraSVSelina VliegerMMM Mulder

Key Points

  • The study aims to determine the prognostic value of Lp(a) in patients with established ASCVD and its associations with coronary plaque characteristics.
  • Combined analysis of ATHEROREMO and IBIS-3 observational studies enrolling 798 patients with stable angina or acute coronary syndrome.
  • Assessment of coronary plaque characteristics using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS).
  • Application of linear and Cox regression models to relate Lp(a) levels to plaque characteristics and long-term outcomes.
  • 75% of patients were male; 32% had Lp(a) levels >75 nmol/L.
  • Higher plaque burden was observed in patients with Lp(a) >75 nmol/L (40.1% vs. 38.3%, p=0.024).
  • No significant associations were found between Lp(a) and long-term major adverse cardiac events or all-cause mortality.

Abstract

Abstract Background 75% were male; 32% had Lp(a) 75 nmol/L. Patients with Lp(a) 75 nmol/L had a significantly higher prevalence of hypercholesterolemia and prior percutaneous coronary intervention. These patients demonstrated higher IVUS-derived plaque burden (40.1% vs. 38.3%, p=0.024), though no associations were found with other plaque characteristics, e.g. minimum lumen area, thin-cap fibroatheroroma, and NIRS-derived lipid core burden index. No association was found between Lp(a) and long-term major adverse cardiac events (hazard ratio HR 1.12, 95% confidence interval CI 0.80–1.57, p = 0.51) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.46–1.02, p = 0.070). Conclusions Among patients with established ASCVD, Lp(a) was associated with plaque burden, supporting evidence that relates Lp(a) to atherosclerotic processes. However, Lp(a) was not associated with long-term cardiac adverse events or mortality in these patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mira et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6988292d0fc35cd7a8849545https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.3554
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Clinical significance of lipoprotein(a) as a residual risk factor for atherosclerotic coronary plaque progression in statin-treated patients with coronary artery disease2025 · 2 citations
  2. 2The impact of lipoprotein(a) on coronary atherosclerotic plaque phenotype in primary prevention2026 · 3 citations
  3. 3Extension of coronary artery disease and resistance to lipid-lowering treatment. Value of Lp(a)2026
  4. 4Lipoprotein(a) and Long-Term Plaque Progression, Low-Density Plaque, and Pericoronary Inflammation2024 · 89 citations
  5. 5Association of elevated lipoprotein(a) with future major adverse cardiovascular events in recurrent ASCVD patients: analysis of a large US electronic health record database2025