Key result
Elevated Lp(a) tracks with coronary plaque burden but fails to predict long-term MACE in ASCVD.
Why the study?
Does elevated Lp(a) >75 nmol/L associate with adverse coronary plaque characteristics and long-term clinical events in patients with established ASCVD?
Observational (n=798)
Yes
Does elevated Lp(a) >75 nmol/L associate with adverse coronary plaque characteristics and long-term clinical events in patients with established ASCVD?
In patients with established ASCVD, elevated Lp(a) is associated with increased coronary plaque burden but not with long-term adverse cardiac events.
Background & aims Although lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an established independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in primary prevention settings, it remains unclear whether Lp(a) contributes to an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with established ASCVD. Objective Ascertain the prognostic value of Lp(a) in patients with established ASCVD and determine its associations with coronary plaque characteristics as assessed by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). Methods The current analysis combines the ATHEROREMO and IBIS-3 observational studies, which together enrolled 798 patients undergoing coronary angiography for stable angina pectoris or acute coronary syndrome. IVUS pullback and NIRS (in 273 patients) were performed to assess coronary plaque characteristics in a non-stenotic study segment. Linear and Cox regression models were applied to relate Lp(a) with coronary plaque characteristics and long-term (up to 10 year) clinical outcomes. Lp(a) was analysed both as a continuous and categorical variable, using 75 nmol/L as threshold. Results Mean (standard deviation) age of the patients was 61.6 (10.8) years; 75% were male; 32% had Lp(a) >75 nmol/L. Patients with Lp(a) >75 nmol/L had a significantly higher prevalence of hypercholesterolemia and prior percutaneous coronary intervention. These patients demonstrated higher IVUS-derived plaque burden (40.1% vs. 38.3%, p=0.024), though no associations were found with other plaque characteristics, e.g. minimum lumen area, thin-cap fibroatheroroma, and NIRS-derived lipid core burden index. No association was found between Lp(a) and long-term major adverse cardiac events (hazard ratio [HR] 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80–1.57, p = 0.51) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.46–1.02, p = 0.070). Conclusions Among patients with established ASCVD, Lp(a) was associated with plaque burden, supporting evidence that relates Lp(a) to atherosclerotic processes. However, Lp(a) was not associated with long-term cardiac adverse events or mortality in these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mira et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Established ASCVD (n=798). Lipoprotein(a) >75 nmol/L vs. Lipoprotein(a) ≤75 nmol/L was evaluated on Long-term major adverse cardiac events (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.80-1.57, p=0.51). In patients with established ASCVD, Lp(a) >75 nmol/L was associated with higher coronary plaque burden (40.1% vs. 38.3%) but not with long-term major adverse cardiac events (HR 1.12; 95% CI 0.80-1.57).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: