PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 11, 2026Sustainability5 citationsOpen Access

Green Street Management Practices and Performance: A Global Review Integrating Bibliometric and Qualitative Analyses

LDLucian DincăGMGabriel MurariuDCDanut Chira

Key Points

  • The review aims to synthesize current knowledge on the management practices and performance of green streets worldwide.
  • Conducted a bibliometric analysis to identify trends in literature.
  • Reviewed qualitative studies on design strategies and maintenance regimes.
  • Examined governance arrangements and performance assessment methods.
  • Well-managed green streets can significantly reduce stormwater runoff and enhance biodiversity.
  • Outcomes vary based on local climate, design specifications, and maintenance intensity.
  • Identified research gaps include a need for long-term monitoring and standardized performance metrics.

Abstract

Green streets—streets that systematically integrate vegetation-based and nature-based solutions into the public right-of-way as part of contemporary urban green infrastructure and climate adaptation strategies—have become an increasingly important planning and design approach. While historical precedents of vegetated and tree-lined streets exist, modern green streets represent a more integrated and performance-oriented paradigm that combines stormwater management, ecosystem service provision, climate resilience, and social functions within coordinated policy and infrastructure frameworks. This review synthesizes current knowledge on green street management practices and their performance across environmental, hydrological, ecological, and socio-spatial dimensions. The analysis examines design strategies, maintenance regimes, governance arrangements, and performance assessment methods reported in the literature. Evidence indicates that well-managed green streets can significantly reduce stormwater runoff, improve water quality, mitigate urban heat, enhance biodiversity, and contribute to pedestrian comfort and neighborhood livability. However, reported outcomes vary widely depending on local climate, design specifications, maintenance intensity, and institutional capacity. Persistent research gaps include limited long-term monitoring, underrepresentation of cities in the Global South, insufficient integration of governance, economic, and social dimensions, and a lack of standardized performance metrics. Comparative and longitudinal studies remain scarce, constraining understanding of lifecycle performance and trade-offs. Future research should prioritize standardized evaluation frameworks, long-term empirical monitoring, socio-spatial equity assessments, and the integration of emerging digital technologies for real-time monitoring and decision support. Strengthening these areas is essential to support evidence-based planning and scalable implementation of green streets as a key component of sustainable urban development.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dincă et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698c1bef267fb587c655df7fhttps://doi.org/10.3390/su18041732
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Managing Urban Green Spaces: A Framework for Environmental, Technological, and Community-Led Adaptation2026
  2. 2Maintenance in sustainable stormwater management: issues, barriers and challenges2024 · 30 citations
  3. 3Definition, Integration and Effectiveness of Integrated Green-Grey Infrastructure in Residential Street Retrofits: A Systematic Literature Review2026 · 1 citations
  4. 4Research on Street Landscape Design Along Urban Rail Transit Lines2024
  5. 5Urban Green Infrastructure for Climate-Resilient Cities: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of Environmental, Social, and Economic Benefits (2000–2022)2025