What question did this study set out to answer?

This research explores the effectiveness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in assessing intracranial pressure in patients with severe brain injury following surgery.

February 12, 2026Neurocritical Care2 citationsOpen Access

Evaluation of Intracranial Pressure in Patients with Severe Brain Injury Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: A Pilot Study with Preliminary Findings

XSXixi Sun JCJiayuan Chai QLQian Li

Key Points

This research explores the effectiveness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in assessing intracranial pressure in patients with severe brain injury following surgery.
Included 34 patients with craniocerebral injuries in intensive care unit
Divided patients based on intracranial pressure measurement (<20 mm Hg vs ≥20 mm Hg)
Performed CEUS examinations within 24 hours post-surgery
Analyzed time-intensity curves of central retinal and short posterior ciliary arteries
Calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for diagnostic accuracy.
44% of patients had intracranial hypertension
Significantly higher arrival time difference (ΔAT) and peak time difference (ΔTP) in intracranial hypertension group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.010)
Peak intensity difference (ΔPkI) was significantly lower in the intracranial hypertension group (P = 0.025)
ΔAT had excellent diagnostic accuracy with AUC of 0.944, optimal cutoff value of 0.86 s, 93.3% sensitivity, and 84.2% specificity.

Abstract

Abstract Background Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has great potential for assessing increased intracranial pressure (ICP); however, the most appropriate parameters remain unknown. This study aimed to explore the application of quantitative analysis of CEUS diagnosing increased ICP in patients with severe brain injury after surgery, and to provide a novel idea for the non-invasive evaluation of ICP. Methods This observational study included 34 patients with craniocerebral injuries admitted to the intensive care unit from May 2022 to December 2023. Patients were divided into a normal cranial pressure group (< 20 mm Hg) and an intracranial hypertension group (≥ 20 mm Hg) on the basis of the invasive ICP monitoring values. All patients underwent CEUS examination within 24 h postoperatively. Time-intensity curves of the central retinal artery and short posterior ciliary artery were generated using CEUS quantitative analysis software. Quantitative parameters were obtained, and the difference was calculated. The diagnostic accuracy of each parameter was assessed by computing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results In total, 15 patients (44%) had intracranial hypertension. The arrival time difference (ΔAT) and peak time difference (ΔTP) were significantly higher in the intracranial hypertension group than in the normal cranial pressure group ( P < 0.001 and P = 0.010, respectively). The peak intensity difference (ΔPkI) was significantly lower in the intracranial hypertension group than in the normal cranial pressure group ( P = 0.025). The diagnostic accuracy of ΔAT for identifying intracranial hypertension was excellent, with an AUC of 0.944 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.874–1.014, which yielded an optimal cutoff value of 0.86 s with 93.3% sensitivity (95% CI 0.849–1.017) and 84.2% specificity (95% CI 0.719–0.964). The AUC of ΔAT was significantly higher than that of ΔTP and ΔPkI (AUC 0.761 and 0.721, respectively; both P < 0.05). Conclusions The CEUS quantitative analysis parameter, ΔAT, is a promising parameter for evaluating postoperative ICP elevation in patients with severe brain injury.

问 AI

Bookmark

View Full Paper