Based on the primary outcome of 1-year implant survival, there was no significant difference between immediate and delayed implantation. However, immediate implantation demonstrated superior secondary outcomes, including periodontal-related indexes, aesthetic effects, quality of life, and patient satisfaction. These findings suggest that immediate implantation may offer clinical advantages in early functional and aesthetic outcomes without compromising implant survival, providing patients with reduced treatment duration and improved peri-implant tissue preservation.
Yang et al. (Tue,) studied this question.