PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology2 citations

Use of Universal Premedication in the Prevention of Allergic Reactions to PEGylated-Asparaginase in Children and Adolescents With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Lymphoblastic Lymphoma

View Full Paper
AFAndrés Felipe FajardoSCStéphanie CoxPMPaula MacDonald

Key Points

  • To evaluate the effect of universal premedication on hypersensitivity reactions to PEGylated-asparaginase in pediatric patients.
  • Reviewed 107 pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoblastic lymphoma.
  • Compared hypersensitivity reaction rates before and after universal premedication implementation.
  • Monitored nadir serum asparaginase activity levels.
  • Analyzed the number of Erwinia-derived asparaginase doses administered.
  • No significant difference in hypersensitivity reactions before (27%) and after (17%) universal premedication (P = 0.25).
  • Severe reactions remained consistent across both groups.
  • Silent inactivation was identified in 4% of patients through SAA monitoring.

Abstract

Asparaginase is an established chemotherapeutic agent for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and lymphoblastic lymphoma (LL) treatment. Pegylated asparaginase (PEG-Asp) is first-line but may lead to allergic reactions in ∼30% of recipients, leading to substitution by Erwinia -derived asparaginase. Studies demonstrate mixed results on the impact of universal premedication on the incidence of infusion reactions. Our center adopted universal premedication with H1 and H2 antagonists and nadir serum asparaginase activity (SAA) level monitoring in 2019. We assessed the impact of universal premedication on hypersensitivity reactions. We reviewed 107 pediatric ALL/LL patients who received 355 PEG-Asp doses, comparing the frequency of hypersensitivity reactions before universal premedication (PM − ) from 2016 to 2018 and after implementation (PM + ) from 2019 to 2021. No significant difference in reactions was observed between PM − (13 reactions, 27%) and PM + (10 reactions, 17%) patients across all risk stratifications ( P =0.25) or in the severity of reactions. SAA monitoring identified 2 patients (4%) with silent inactivation. The number of Erwinia doses administered between groups did not differ significantly (325 vs. 210, P =0.13). Universal premedication with H1 and H2 antagonists did not impact the number or grade of hypersensitivity reactions to PEG-Asp. We suggest SAA monitoring for patients receiving PEG-Asp to identify silent inactivations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fajardo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6efe5be6419ac0d550a1https://doi.org/10.1097/mph.0000000000003164
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper