Abstract Background Households are a focus of tuberculosis (TB) active case finding strategies. However, little is known about patterns of (non-infectious) latent TB infection clustering in households without a known infectious index case, or how household membership affects progression through the TB infection care cascade. Methods Using data from a multistate community health center network in the US, we identified individuals with a positive TST or IGRA between 2014-2022. We implemented an algorithm to link these “sentinel patients” with household members in the database. We determined rates and predictors of TST/IGRA testing, test positivity among those tested, and treatment prescription among household members. Results We identified 35,772 sentinel patients with a positive TST or IGRA, who were linked to 129,432 household members. Of household members, 33,821 (26.1%) had a TST/IGRA within two years of the sentinel patient’s positive test, of whom 3,127 (9.3%) had a positive test and 641 (20.6%) were prescribed TB infection treatment. Whether the sentinel patient was prescribed treatment was associated with household member being tested (aOR 1.16 95%CI 1.10, 1.21) and being prescribed treatment (aOR 9.68 95%CI: 7.71, 12.16). Conclusions Most household members had no documented TB infection test before or within 2 years after a sentinel patient in the household had a positive test. Household member and sentinel patient characteristics, conditions, and treatment were associated with household member testing, test positivity, and treatment prescription. Households may be an effective but underutilized context to identify and treat individuals with TB infection, even when no TB disease cases are present.
Campbell et al. (Sat,) studied this question.