PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 16, 2026The Journal of the Civil War Era0 citations

Parodic Exaggeration, Transparent Lying, and Conspiracy Thinking in US History

View Full Paper
EFElaine Frantz

Key Points

  • The research aims to examine the historical prevalence of political dishonesty in U.S. history and its implications.
  • Analyzes historical examples of political dishonesty and its usage by leaders
  • Focuses on the Reconstruction era and the strategies of the MAGA movement
  • Explores the relationship between exaggerated claims, lies, and conspiracy theories
  • Highlights the historical patterns of political leaders using dishonesty as a strategy
  • Identifies the role of conspiracy theories in challenging existing narratives
  • Sheds light on contemporary political discourse influenced by past strategies

Abstract

Abstract: Historians of the United States have not been sufficiently attuned to the prevalence of political dishonesty as a strategy within national politics. Particularly but not only at times of serious contention—including the Reconstruction era—political leaders, movements, and the press have often prevaricated, sometimes in ways intended to be understood as dishonest and instrumental speech by supporters and opponents alike. Donald Trump's and the MAGA movement's strategies of making transparently false claims, parodically exaggerating opponents' positions, and building conspiracy theories have long histories as methods to challenge hegemonic discourses. Exploring this context may shed light on today's political discourse.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Elaine Frantz (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699264d1eb1f82dc367a0ae6https://doi.org/10.1353/cwe.2026.a982903
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper