Historians reveal links between political leaders' dishonest strategies and conspiracy theories, suggesting insights into today’s political discourse.
Historians of the United States have not been sufficiently attuned to the prevalence of political dishonesty as a strategy within national politics. Particularly but not only at times of serious contention—including the Reconstruction era—political leaders, movements, and the press have often prevaricated, sometimes in ways intended to be understood as dishonest and instrumental speech by supporters and opponents alike. Donald Trump's and the MAGA movement's strategies of making transparently false claims, parodically exaggerating opponents' positions, and building conspiracy theories have long histories as methods to challenge hegemonic discourses. Exploring this context may shed light on today's political discourse.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elaine Frantz (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: