PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 16, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Spatial Distribution Patterns of Bed Shear Stress in Zones with Alternating Tall and Short Vegetation

View Full Paper
YLYameng LiuXLXiaoguang LiuJWJiasheng Wang

Key Points

  • This research examines the influence of vegetation density and height on bed shear stress in floodplain environments.
  • Conducted flume experiments to assess the effects of vegetation configuration on flow and shear stress.
  • Compared bed shear stress estimations using the Law of the Wall, Reynolds stress, and turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) methods.
  • High-density vegetation reduced mean bed shear stress by 17-36%, promoting sediment deposition.
  • Variations between tall and short vegetation increased local bed shear stress by 15-26%, raising scour risk.
  • The Law of the Wall method produced errors of 15-25% under heterogeneous conditions compared to TKE and Reynolds stress approaches.

Abstract

Natural floodplain vegetation exhibits heterogeneous patterns in height and density that substantially affect flow and bed stability. Most previous studies have examined flows through uniformly distributed vegetation, resulting in a limited understanding of mixed-height canopies. Consequently, existing methods for estimating bed shear stress remain inadequately validated under such heterogeneous conditions. To bridge this gap, we conducted flume experiments to investigate how the density and height configuration of rigid vegetation affect the spatial distribution of bed shear stress, comparing three commonly used approaches: the Law of the Wall, Reynolds stress, and turbulent kinetic energy (TKE). Results showed strong agreement between TKE and Reynolds stress methods; the Law of the Wall produced larger errors (15–25%) due to log-layer disruption in vegetated zones, limiting its use. Vegetation density dominated bed shear stress: high-density areas reduced mean stress by 17–36%, promoting deposition, whereas tall–short vegetation interfaces increased local stress by 15–26%, elevating scour risk. Flow velocity raised overall stress by 15–25%, while water depth had minimal effect. Sparse vegetation led to patchy stress distributions and higher scour potential, while dense vegetation favored uniform stress and sediment accumulation. These findings clarify bed shear stress mechanisms in heterogeneous vegetation and provide a basis for floodplain restoration and stability management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69926552eb1f82dc367a13c0https://doi.org/10.3390/su18041972
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Bed Shear Stress and Near‐Bed Flow Through Sparse Arrays of Rigid Emergent Vegetation2024 · 19 citations
  2. 2Experimental analysis of vegetation heterogeneity on flow characteristics and bed morphology in partially vegetated channels2025 · 2 citations
  3. 3Near-bed velocity law and bed shear stress in vegetated flows2026 · 2 citations
  4. 4Flow Characteristics in Open Channels with Non-Submerged Rigid Vegetation Landscape2024 · 2 citations
  5. 5The contrasting effects of vegetation height and density on flow and turbulence in a patch of vegetation2026