Abstract Aim Lack of fusion remains a challenge in posterior-anterior spine surgery in general and after trauma. Additional anterior stabilizing procedures bear a risk of complications. There are still few studies available on the role of different surgical strategies to investigate fusion. This study was designed to enhance the role of additional stabilizing locking plates in cases of anterior bone graft-fusion procedures in spine trauma patients. Methods 83 patients with posterior-anterior stabilization after spine trauma using a tricortical bone graft harvested from the iliac crest were examined retrospectively concerning fusion, surgical strategy (with / without additional anterior stabilizing plate) and patient derived factors (BMI, smoking habits, neurologic symptoms, ISS). Bony fusion was determined by CT scan. Results Patients with additional anterior plate showed a significantly higher fusion rate. Lack of fusion was detected in 10% of patients treated with additional plate anteriorly compared to 48% of patients with anterior bone graft alone ( p = 0.035). Patient derived factors had no influence on fusion. BMI was comparable in both groups (23.5 in additional plate group, 25.1 in bone graft only-group), as was ISS (9 vs. 8.5), age (40.1ys vs. 41.7ys) and gender (male: female 1.3:1). Conclusion Additional anterior plating devices lead to an improved fusion rate. Enhanced stability of the anterior construct inserted bone graft may be the reason due to higher stiffness and less motion of the segment. As in other fields of trauma surgery, lack of stability may be responsible for pseudarthrosis in spine surgery as well.
Saman et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: