PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2002Thrombosis and Haemostasis275 citations

Postpartum Bone Mineral Density in Women Treated for Thromboprophylaxis with Unfractionated Heparin or LMW Heparin

VPVille PettiläPLPekka LeinonenAMAntti Markkola

Structured PICO

Does dalteparin prevent bone mineral density loss compared to unfractionated heparin in pregnant women requiring thromboprophylaxis?

P
Population
Pregnant women with confirmed previous or current thromboembolism
I
Intervention
Low-molecular-weight heparin (dalteparin) once daily subcutaneously
C
Comparator
Unfractionated sodium heparin twice daily subcutaneously (and a healthy control group of delivered women)
O
Outcome
Bone mineral density (BMD) in the lumbosacral spine measured with DEXAsurrogate

Dalteparin preserves bone mineral density significantly better than unfractionated heparin when used for long-term thromboprophylaxis during and after pregnancy.

Abstract

Summary Venous thromboembolism remains an important cause of maternal mortality. In a randomised open study, 44 pregnant women with confirmed previous or current thromboembolism were randomised to receive either low-molecular-weight heparin, dalteparin (N = 21) once daily subcutaneously or unfractionated sodium heparin (UF heparin, N = 23) twice daily subcutaneously for thromboprophylaxis during pregnancy and puerperium. Bone mineral density (BMD) in the lumbosacral spine was measured with dual X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) 1, 6, 16, 52 weeks and, if possible, 3 years after delivery. BMD values were also compared with those of healthy, delivered women (N =19). Mean BMD of the lumbar spine was significantly lower in the unfractionated heparin group compared with the dalteparin and with the control groups (repeated measures ANOVA p = 0.02). BMD in the dalteparin group did not differ from BMD of healthy delivered women. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that therapy was the only independent factor influencing BMD at weeks 16 and 52. Therefore we recommend use of dalteparin instead of UF heparin for long-term thromboprophylaxis during and after pregnancy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pettilä et al. (2002) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699957b701330c633145d1bchttps://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1612970
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Prospective evaluation of bone density in pregnant women receiving the low molecular weight heparin enoxaparin sodium2000 · 60 citations
  2. 2Prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic diseases during pregnancy with dalteparin2000 · 42 citations
  3. 3The risks of antenatal subcutaneous heparin prophylaxis: a controlled trial1983 · 158 citations
  4. 4Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin During Pregnancy and Delivery: Preliminary Experience With 41 Pregnancies1996 · 152 citations
  5. 5A Histomorphometric Comparison of the Effects of Heparin and Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin on Cancellous Bone in Rats1997 · 172 citations