VCF procedures in Brazil more than doubled over 9 years, with private sector performing 57% despite covering 25% population and similar mortality rates in both sectors.
Do vena cava filter placement rates and in-hospital mortality differ between the private and public healthcare systems in Brazil?
Vena cava filter placement in Brazil increased by 140% over 9 years, with significant systemic disparities showing a 4.25-fold higher per-capita rate in the private versus public healthcare system despite comparable in-hospital mortality.
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
• The private sector performs the majority of procedures despite serving a minority of the population. • National procedure volume more than doubled (140% increase) in almost a decade. • The Southeast region is responsible for 70% of all private procedures. Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) is a major global health concern, with Vena Cava Filters (VCFs) serving as an alternative to anticoagulation in high-risk patients. Brazil’s VCF trends remain understudied, particularly in its dual public-private healthcare system. This database study allows a broad overview of the Brazilian healthcare landscape. This cross-sectional nationwide analysis used Brazilian public (SUS/TabNet) and private (ANS/D-TISS) healthcare databases (2015–2023) to assess VCF placement rates, regional disparities, and in-hospital mortality. Data included 21,630 procedures, analyzed via generalized linear models (Gamma/Poisson distributions). The private system performed 57% of VCFs (12,323) despite covering only 25% of the population, with a 4.25-fold higher procedure rate per capita than the public system (29.45 vs. 6.42 per-million). Women accounted for 57.8% of recipients. The Southeast region dominated (70% private, 40.5% public), while the North and Midwest had the lowest rates. Mortality rates were comparable (public 6.7% vs. private 7.4%, p = 0.066), peaking during COVID-19. Procedure volumes rose 140% over 9-years, contrasting with declining U.S. trends post-FDA restrictions. Brazil’s VCF use reflects systemic disparities, with private-system overrepresentation and regional gaps. This study enables unprecedented insights into large-scale VCF implementation across diverse healthcare subsystems.
Bueno et al. (Thu,) reported a other. VCF procedures in Brazil more than doubled over 9 years, with private sector performing 57% despite covering 25% population and similar mortality rates in both sectors.