PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 23, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Random Projections as First-Class Layers in Analytical Neural Networks: Enabling Microscopic AI for Edge Devices

View Full Paper
AMAnsh MathurAMAtrishman MukherjeeSDSupratik Dey

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore the efficiency of random projections as initial layers in neural networks to reduce memory costs and maintain performance.
  • Implemented fixed random orthogonal projections as the first layer in analytical neural networks.
  • Conducted experiments using the MNIST dataset to compare the performance of architectures with and without random projections.
  • Analyzed memory usage and test accuracy across various layer configurations.
  • Achieved 86.1% test accuracy with RP(784, 300) architecture, matching the baseline with significantly fewer parameters.
  • Using QR-orthogonal projections at k = 200, attained 86.3% accuracy while reducing accumulator memory to 0.17 MB.
  • Identity truncation alternative resulted in only 49.4% accuracy, demonstrating the importance of random projections in improving performance.

Abstract

We investigate the use of fixed random orthogonal projections as explicit first layers in analytically-solved neural networks. Unlike gradient-based training, analytical (closed-form) methods solve for weights via matrix inversion of accumulated co-variance statistics. The dominant memory cost is therefore the accumulator matrices-specifically the d × d covariance Σ XX and the d × c cross-covariance Σ XY-not the forward-pass parameters. By placing a zero-parameter Random Projection (RP) layer before the first learnable layer, we reduce the effective input dimensionality d from the raw feature size (e.g. 784 for MNIST) to an arbitrary bottleneck k, shrinking the accumu-lator from O(d 2) to O(k 2). On MNIST we demonstrate that an RP(784, 300) → Linear(300, 10) architecture matches the baseline Linear(784, 10) in test accuracy (86.1 % vs. 86.1 %) while requiring 3,010 versus 7,850 parameters and 0.37 MB versus 2.49 MB of accumulator memory-a 6.7× reduction. With QR-orthogonal projections at k = 200, we achieve 86.3 % test accuracy, exceeding the full-rank baseline, while using only 0.17 MB (14.6× smaller). Identity truncation-the naïve alternative-collapses to 49.4 %, confirming that the mixing property of random projections is essential. Architectures as tiny as RP(784, 64) → Linear(64, 10) still reach 80.6 % accuracy with 650 learnable parameters and 0.02 MB accumu-lators, making them viable candidates for ultra-constrained edge deployment. These results are grounded in the Johnson-Lindenstrauss lemma and generalise to any linear-algebraic learning system that forms X ⊤ X.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mathur et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699bee1c1c6c6bad5397fc9ahttps://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.32123.99368
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper