Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analytical methods reduce memory costs and maintain accuracy in edge devices, enabling efficient AI applications.
We investigate the use of fixed random orthogonal projections as explicit first layers in analytically-solved neural networks. Unlike gradient-based training, analytical (closed-form) methods solve for weights via matrix inversion of accumulated co-variance statistics. The dominant memory cost is therefore the accumulator matrices-specifically the d × d covariance Σ XX and the d × c cross-covariance Σ XY-not the forward-pass parameters. By placing a zero-parameter Random Projection (RP) layer before the first learnable layer, we reduce the effective input dimensionality d from the raw feature size (e.g. 784 for MNIST) to an arbitrary bottleneck k, shrinking the accumu-lator from O(d 2) to O(k 2). On MNIST we demonstrate that an RP(784, 300) → Linear(300, 10) architecture matches the baseline Linear(784, 10) in test accuracy (86.1 % vs. 86.1 %) while requiring 3,010 versus 7,850 parameters and 0.37 MB versus 2.49 MB of accumulator memory-a 6.7× reduction. With QR-orthogonal projections at k = 200, we achieve 86.3 % test accuracy, exceeding the full-rank baseline, while using only 0.17 MB (14.6× smaller). Identity truncation-the naïve alternative-collapses to 49.4 %, confirming that the mixing property of random projections is essential. Architectures as tiny as RP(784, 64) → Linear(64, 10) still reach 80.6 % accuracy with 650 learnable parameters and 0.02 MB accumu-lators, making them viable candidates for ultra-constrained edge deployment. These results are grounded in the Johnson-Lindenstrauss lemma and generalise to any linear-algebraic learning system that forms X ⊤ X.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mathur et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: