Interest is growing in understanding the antecedents of reconciling exploration and exploitation, or ambidexterity. Research on the antecedents of ambidexterity has focused on formal organizational design (i.e., temporal cycles or structural means) or individual abilities (e.g., cognitive flexibility). However, research has overlooked the fact that individual abilities do not operate in a vacuum; how individuals perceive a situation can activate the abilities needed for ambidexterity. Thus, we bring a novel situational perspective to the study of ambidexterity. We examine how a manager’s situational perception of their capacity to influence others and control outcomes (i.e., sense of power) affects their ambidexterity. Across three studies with middle managers, we show that a higher sense of power increases ambidextrous behavior; cognitive flexibility emerges as a key mechanism explaining this relationship. We highlight the crucial role of situational perception in ambidexterity and open up opportunities for better understanding situational antecedents of important organizational behaviors.
Crouzevialle et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: