18-month rivaroxaban reduced recurrent venous thromboembolism versus 6-month in low PS cancer PE patients (2.7% vs 19.0%, P=0.049), with no major bleeding increase.
Does 18-month rivaroxaban treatment reduce recurrent venous thromboembolism compared to 6-month treatment in patients with cancer-associated low-risk pulmonary embolism across different performance status scores?
Extended 18-month rivaroxaban therapy reduces recurrent VTE in cancer-associated low-risk PE, with significant benefit in patients with good performance status but potential bleeding concerns in those with restricted physical activity.
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
Background The ONCO PE (Optimal Duration of Anticoagulation Therapy for Low‐Risk Pulmonary Embolism Patients With Cancer) trial demonstrated the superiority of 18‐month compared with 6‐month rivaroxaban treatment for cancer‐associated low‐risk pulmonary embolism in reducing recurrent venous thromboembolism. However, it was uncertain whether the results could be applicable to patients with different performance status (PS) scores, which evaluate the physical condition of patients with cancer undergoing anticancer treatment. Methods In this post hoc subgroup analysis of the ONCO PE trial, we compared the 18‐month and 6‐month rivaroxaban treatment groups in 2 subgroups: the low PS score (no restricted physical activity: PS=0; n=79) and high PS score (restricted physical activity: PS ≥1; n=99) subgroups. The primary end point was recurrent venous thromboembolism, and the major secondary end point was major bleeding. Results The rate of recurrent venous thromboembolism was lower in the 18‐month rivaroxaban group than in the 6‐month rivaroxaban group, significantly among the low PS score subgroup (2.7% versus 19.0%, P =0.049) and numerically among the high PS score subgroup without statistical significance (7.7% versus 19.1%, P =0.10). The rate of major bleeding was not different between the 2 groups among the low PS score subgroup (2.7% versus 7.1%, P =0.39), while it was numerically higher in the 18‐month rivaroxaban group than in the 6‐month rivaroxaban group among the high PS score subgroup, without statistical significance (11.5% versus 4.3%, P =0.20). Conclusions Extended anticoagulation therapy for patients with cancer‐associated low‐risk pulmonary embolism might have a potential benefit in reducing thrombotic risk irrespective of PS score, whereas there might be some concerns on an increased risk of major bleeding in patients with a high PS score. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique Identifier: NCT04724460.
Xiong et al. (Fri,) reported a other. 18-month rivaroxaban reduced recurrent venous thromboembolism versus 6-month in low PS cancer PE patients (2.7% vs 19.0%, P=0.049), with no major bleeding increase.