PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2026International Journal of Hydrogen Energy6 citationsOpen Access

Technical assessment and economic analysis of zero-carbon freight road transportation vehicles

View Full Paper
MMMarco MagginiUniversity of SienaGLGabriele LoretiNational Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic DevelopmentFSFrancesca SantoniNational Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development

Key Points

  • Fuel cell electric vehicles can be more cost-effective at higher mileage and certain weight classes.
  • The study quantifies total costs of ownership across multiple vehicle technologies for better decision-making.
  • Hydrogen internal combustion engines and fuel cell technologies fill gaps in emissions reduction initiatives.
  • Conventional diesel remains the most economical choice for many vehicle weight classes and driving ranges.

Abstract

The transition to hydrogen fuel as an alternative energy source for heavy-duty vehicles (HDVs) can reduce greenhouse gas emissions and dependency on fossil fuels. This study quantifies and compares the total costs of ownership and transportation of light-duty and heavy-duty commercial trucks, across five drivetrain technologies: conventional diesel internal combustion engine (ICE), hydrogen internal combustion engine (H 2 -ICE), battery electric vehicle (BEV), constant power fuel cell electric vehicle (C-FCEV), and variable power fuel cell electric vehicle (V-FCEV). To the best of our knowledge, the present study provides the first comparison of TCO and LCOT across all these drivetrain technologies, filling a gap in the literature and offering quantitative evidence to guide future zero-emission vehicle strategies. The findings indicate that conventional diesel remains the cost-optimal option across most driving ranges and vehicle weight classes. However, FCEVs are a competitive solution at middle to high mileages (i.e ≥ 300 km ) and for low to middle class weight (i.e 3.5 t, 5.2 t, and 18 t). Depending on the vehicle category, the levelized cost of transportation of FCEVs is 45%–55% lower than that of BEVs. • We compare battery and hydrogen trucks on a techno-economic basis. • We size the powertrains for different weight classes. • We calculate total cost of ownership and levelized cost of transportation. • Battery electric trucks are competitive for short driving ranges. • For driving ranges >300 km, fuel cell electric trucks are the best zero-emission solution.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Maggini et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75f8fc6e9836116a2b061https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2026.153707
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper